American National Standard
Testing and Rating of —
Severe Windstorm Resistant Components
for Swinging Door Assemblies
ANSI A250.13-2008
Revision of ANSI A250.13-2003
1.1 This standard provides procedures for testing
and establishing load ratings (design pressure in
pounds per square foot or design load in pounds
force) for components of exterior swinging door
assemblies for purposes of protection of openings
during severe windstorm conditions, such as
a hurricane, that produces sustained wind speeds
or gusts in a range of 110 to 170 miles per hour as
defined by ASCE 7. It is not intended to simulate
wind forces generated by tornadoes.
1.2 The procedures cover all components normally
assembled to form an exterior swinging door
system. This includes door frames, hardware mullions,
thresholds, frame anchorage, hinges, locksets,
latches and bolts, doors, sidelights, transoms
and glazing systems. This procedure applies to
both single swing and pair assemblies and also
includes procedures for testing and rating components
for both in-swing and out-swing installations.
1.3 The evaluations required by this standard are
based on the performance tests specified in ASTM
E1886, ASTM E1996 and ASTM E330.
1.4 Evaluations under this procedure are designed
to determine the ability of exterior doors to remain
closed under conditions present in severe windstorms,
including high, fluctuating wind speeds
and the presence of wind-born debris. Assemblies
meeting these requirements are less likely to open
during a storm, preventing potentially large pressure
differentials which may cause or contribute to
major structural damage. This procedure does not
consider it necessary for the door assembly to be
capable of preventing water intrusion as a result of
severe windstorm exposure conditions.
It is recognized that products and assemblies
meeting these requirements will not necessarily prevent all forms of damage associated with hurricanes
and other severe windstorms. It is also assumed
that these assemblies themselves might be
damaged in a severe windstorm to an extent that
would require repair or replacement after such an
event.
TOP
Severe Windstorm: A weather event such as a
hurricane that produces sustained wind speeds or
gusts in a range of 110 to 170 miles per hour.
Operable: Capable of being opened by the application
of ordinary levels of applied force to the
latch operator and door assembly.
Note: Door assemblies that have been subjected
to the severe conditions of the tests involved in this
method are not expected to be undamaged and
thus will normally not operate with the low force levels
generally required for undamaged assemblies.
The goal is to provide an assembly that will remain
closed during the windstorm, but not be damaged
to the extent that it requires the use of tools to be
opened after the event.
Stiffness Classification: A measure of a door’s
overall resistance to bending as determined by
a twist test under a prescribed loading condition.
Stiffness classifications allow for the evaluation of
exit hardware / door interactions where either the
bending of the door may tend to cause disengagement
of the latch, or where applied hardware may
be capable of reinforcing the door to reduce bending
under load.
Component: Any of several manufactured items,
classified / listed and labeled, used in the construction
and installation of a swinging door assembly.
Components include door frames, doors, hardware,
glazing systems and similar products normally
supplied separately to a job-site where they
are assembled and / or installed to form a complete
assembly.
Design Load: The specified point force applied
to a product. Units of measure are pounds force
(lbf).
Design Pressure: The specified force applied to
a specified unit area of product surface. Units of
measure are pounds-force per square foot (psf).
Impact Energy: The specified dynamic load
applied to a product. Units of measure are footpounds
(ft-lbf).
In-Swing Door: A door with the push side on
the exterior or that swings into the building when
opened. Negative pressure acts to close this door
and positive pressure acts to open this door.
Out-Swing Door: A door with the pull side on the
exterior or that swings away from the building when
opened. Negative pressure acts to open this door
and positive pressure acts to close this door.
Labeled: Equipment or materials to which has
been attached a label, symbol, or other identifying
mark of an organization that is acceptable to the
Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) and concerned
with product evaluation, that maintains periodic inspections
of production of labeled equipment or
materials, and by whose labeling the manufacturer
indicates compliance with appropriate standards
or performance in a specified manner.
Classified: Products or materials of a specific
group category that are constructed, inspected,
tested and subsequently reinspected in accordance
with an established set of requirements.
The classification process is performed by an organization
acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction.
Listed: Equipment materials or services included
in a list published by an organization that is acceptable
to the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) and
concerned with evaluation of products or services,
that maintains periodic evaluation of services and
whose listing states that either the equipment, material,
or service meets identified standards or has
been tested and found suitable for a specified purpose.
TOP
3 General
3.1 Units of Measurement
3.1.1 When a value for measurement is followed by
a value in other units in parentheses, the second
value is only approximate. The first stated valueis the requirement. The primary units are inchpound.
Appendix A contains a table of the Imperial
values used in this standard and corresponding SI
values.
3.1.2 Unless specifically indicated otherwise, tolerances
shall be in accordance with Appendix A.
3.1.3 Where load ratings are to be applied in units
of pounds per square foot (psf), these values shall
be expressed in 5-pound-per-square-foot increments.
For components that are rated in terms
of pounds force, values shall be expressed in
10-pound increments. All rated values shall be
determined by rounding down from values derived
from tests.
3.2 Referenced Standards
3.2.1 ANSI/ASCE 7-02, Minimum Design Loads
for Buildings and Other Structures
3.2.2 ANSI/SDI A250.4-2001, Test Procedure and
Acceptance Criteria for Physical Endurance for
Steel Doors, Frames, Frame Anchors and Hardware
Reinforcings
3.2.3 ASTM E330-2002, Standard Test Method
for Structural Performance of Exterior Windows,
Doors, Skylights and Curtain Walls by Uniform
Static Air Pressure Difference
3.2.4 ASTM E1886-2005, Standard Test Method
for Performance of Exterior Windows, Curtain
Walls, Doors, and Storm Shutters Impacted by
Missile(s) and Exposed to Cyclic Pressure Differentials
3.2.5 ASTM E1996-2005, Standard Specification
for Performance of Exterior Windows, Curtain
Walls, Doors and Storm Shutters Impacted by
Windborne Debris in Hurricanes
3.2.6 ASTM F476-84 (2002) Standard Test Methods
for Security of Swinging Door Assemblies
3.2.7 ANSI/BHMA A156.1-2000, Butts and Hinges
3.2.8 ANSI/BHMA A156.16-2002, Auxiliary Hardware
TOP
3.3 Undated References
3.3.1 References to standards listed above shall
be to the edition indicated.
4 Overview
4.1 The procedures in this document are designed
to evaluate each critical component used
in a swinging door assembly for the component’s
ability to perform its intended function. The evaluation
is conducted under the conditions of stress
and loading the component would be subjected to
in the testing of a complete assembly under the
assembly test methods commonly specified for
severe windstorm resistance.
4.2 The tests and evaluations required by this procedure
include both the application of engineering
safety factors and worst-case analysis to ensure
that component substitutions in field assemblies
will perform to the minimum levels expected.
4.3 Components evaluated by this method are
classified into various strength categories that can
be used to determine assembly ratings. A single
component may have multiple ratings depending
on various parameters such as size, number and
location of anchors or fasteners, type of surrounding
construction and other factors. Proper application
of these ratings allows for the determination
of an assembly’s design pressure rating and
minimum impact energy resistance. These ratings
are intended to be used to determine compliance
with code requirements developed for complete
assemblies.
4.3.1 Doors are rated for design pressure in
pounds per square foot (psf), impact energy in
foot-pounds (ft-lbf) and stiffness classification.
Stiffness is required in determining the interaction
between the door bending under load, transmission
of impact energy to latching hardware and
frames, and latching engagement. Stiffness class
is intended only to establish use of exit hardware
on doors.
4.4 Proper application of this standard requires a
basic level of understanding of physics, mechanics
and materials science.
4.5 This procedure provides specific tests and rating
methods for the following components:
Section 5 – Door Frames
Section 6 – Hinges
Section 7 – Latching Hardware
Section 7.1 – Locksets (Bored, Mortise, Deadbolts)
Section 7.2 – Single Point Rim or Mortise Exit Devices
Section 7.3 – Multi-point Latches (including flush
and surface bolts)
Section 8 – Doors
Section 9 – Door Lite Kits
Section 10 – Sidelight and transom frames
Section 11 – Miscellaneous Components
Section 11.1 – Hardware Mullions
Section 11.2 – Thresholds
TOP
5 Door Frames
5.1 Frames are to be evaluated in the largest door
opening sizes, minimum jamb depth and minimum
frame material thickness for which a design rating
is to be determined. Frames intended for use
in both single swing and pair assemblies shall be
tested in both configurations. Frames are to be
installed following the manufacturer’s written instructions
which are to include:
a) Wall substrate – wood/steel stud, concrete,
masonry, structural steel.
b) Anchors – number, size, type and spacing
of anchors, anchor or bolt embedment,
and number and type of fasteners required
at each anchor location.
c) Reinforcements – location and attachment.
d) Gasketing – location, type and attachment.
e) Hinges – number, type, size and locations.
f) Latching Hardware – type and location.
5.2 Test Procedure
5.2.1 Static Pressure Test
5.2.1.1 The frame shall be installed into a test unit
constructed to simulate the wall design specified
by the frame manufacturer. The frame installation
shall be in accordance with the frame manufacturer’s
written instructions (refer to figure 1 for typical
details). For wall designs that differ significantly
from those shown, the test installation shall simulate
actual intended wall design and anchorage.
A flush door rated for not less than the desired
frame design pressure shall be mounted with the
number of hinges specified by the frame manufacturer.
For single-swing frames, a single-point
simulated latch and a stainless steel strike shall be
installed between 38" and 42" above the bottom
of the frame (see figure 2.) The door and latching
hardware shall be of sufficient strength so that
they do not fail at the required test load. Door (s)
shall be installed in the direction of swing for the
desired listing.

Figure 1 – Wall Substrates for Frame Tests
TOP
5.2.1.2 For pair frames, two flush doors rated
for not less than the desired frame design pressure
shall be installed with a simulated latching
arrangement with a top and bottom bolt on the
inactive door and a single point latch on the active
door latching into the inactive door. The doors
used are to be reinforced as described in 5.2.1.2.1
and latched as shown in figure 2.
If the manufacturer specifies other latch/lock locations,
tests shall be conducted under specified conditions and the resulting rating shall specify the
latching requirements.
5.2.1.2.1 The flush door used shall be reinforced
along the latch or meeting edge by bolting a
1-1/4 inch by 1-1/4 inch by 3/16 inch structural steel
angle to both faces of the door with 1/4-20 bolts at
16 (±) 1 inches on center and within 6 (±1) inches
of the corners. The angle shall be placed such
that the free leg of the angle is oriented toward the
edge of the door and is located at 3 inches from
the door latch edge (see figure 2).

Figure 2 – Door Reinforcement for Frame Tests
TOP
5.2.1.3 The frame and door assembly shall be installed
in a static pressure test chamber per the
requirements of ASTM E330.
5.2.1.4 The assembly shall be subjected to a static
pressure equal to 1.5 times the design pressure
rating specified by the frame manufacturer under
both positive and negative pressure. Each pressure
cycle shall be applied for a minimum of 30
seconds, then released and reduced to zero.
5.2.1.5 At the conclusion of this test, the frame shall not prevent the door (s) from operating after
the simulated latch bolt (s) has been retracted and
a 15 pound force is applied at the mid-height of the
door, horizontally 1 inch from the lock edge. The
frame shall remain in the opening.
5.2.2 Impact Test
5.2.2.1 Upon completion of the static pressure
test an identical assembly shall be subjected to
impacts with an impact energy of 350 foot-pounds. The impact energy shall be delivered by one of the
following two methods:
Method 1 – Deliver impact energy by a 100-pound
total weight pendulum impactor fitted with a number
2 or better, 12-inch-long Douglas Fir or Southern
Yellow Pine, nominal 2 by 4 striking face. The
pendulum is to be suspended in a manner that assures
a direct normal impact to the door assembly.
Refer to ASTM F476 for details of a comparable
pendulum impact device (see figure 3)

Figure 3 – Pendulum Impactor
TOP
Method 2 – Deliver the impact energy in accordance
with the impact method defined in ASTM E1996 using a 9 pound 2 x 4 missile impacting
end-on at a velocity of 50 feet per second.
5.2.2.2 Impacts are to be delivered to the exterior
side of the door (s) per ASTM E1886. Impact locations
as described below and as shown in figure
4).
5.2.2.2.1 Single Frames
Five impacts in accordance with Figure 4.

Figure 4 – Impact Locations for Frame Tests
TOP
5.2.2.2.2 Pair Frames
Six impacts in accordance with Figure 4.
5.2.3 At the conclusion of this test, the frame shall
not prevent the door (s) from operating after the
simulated latch bolt (s) has been retracted and a
15-pound force is applied at the mid-height of the
door, 1 inch horizontally from the lock edge. The
frame shall remain in the opening.
5.3 Cycle Test
5.3.1 Upon completion of the impact tests specified
in 5.2, the same assembly shall be subjected to the pressure cycling test specified in ASTM
E1886.
5.3.2 At the conclusion of this test, the frame shall
not prevent the door (s) from operating after the
simulated latch bolt (s) has been retracted and a
15-pound force is applied at the mid-height of the
door, 1-inch horizontally from the lock edge. The
frame shall remain in the opening.
5.4 Frame Ratings
5.4.1 Frames that meet the criteria specified in
this section shall be rated for the design pressure
attained in the evaluation and for impact energy
resistance. Ratings shall be specific to positive
and negative design pressure configuration (single/
pair, in-swing/out-swing) and shall apply to all
overall frame sizes (not to exceed either height or
width of frame tested) equal to or smaller than the
frame tested.
TOP
6 Hinges
6.1 Leaf Hinges
Three representative specimens shall be tested.
Ratings shall be based on the lowest load successfully
sustained by all three specimens.
6.1.1 Impact Test
6.1.1.1 Hinges shall be mounted for testing in the
test fixture shown in figure 5. Hinges are to be
mounted to the simulated frame and door sections
using screws provided by the hinge manufacturer.

Figure 5 – Hinge Structural Load Test Fixture
TOP
6.1.1.2 One 125 foot-pound impact shall be delivered
to the simulated door section at a point 6
inches from the hinge centerline using the pendulum
impactor specified in figure 3. Shearing of any
fastener or deformation of the hinge which renders
the hinge inoperable shall constitute a failure. The
simulated door section shall be tested as an inswinging
door.
NOTE: Impact energy specified delivers approximately
twice the energy to the hinge as occurs in
a typical door assembly test using a 9 pound 2 x 4
missile at 50 feet-per-second.
6.1.1.2.1 Exception
Hinges listed only for use in out-swing door assemblies
do not require an impact test.
6.1.2 Structural Load Test
6.1.2.1 The test assembly described in 6.1.1.1
shall be mounted in a testing machine and loaded
at a rate of 0.05 inches per minute until failure. The load shall be applied through a 3/4-inch diameter
roller and 1/4-inch thick by 3-inch wide steel plate in
a manner that places the attachments in shear on
the push side of the simulated door section. The
load at failure shall be recorded.
6.1.3 Rating
6.1.3.1 Hinges shall be rated for a design load
based on the lowest ultimate load value determined
in 6.1.2.1, divided by a safety factor of 1.5.
TOP
6.2 Continuous Hinges and Pivots
6.2.1 Continuous hinges and/or pivots shall be
tested in the maximum length with the minimum
number of fasteners supplied by the manufacturer.
Continuous hinges and/or pivots are to be tested
applied to a simulated door as described in section
5.2.1.1 and a frame assembly designed to withstand
the loads required to evaluate the hinge and/
or pivots to the level required. A simulated frame
constructed from 4-inch to 6-inch wide structural
steel channel and with a solid steel stop 1-inch
wide by 5/8-inch high is suitable for this purpose.
Pivots and continuous hinges shall be tested using
the maximum size of door for which a rating is
desired.
6.2.2 Static Pressure Test
6.2.2.1 Apply a pressure equal to 1.5 times the
hinge manufacturer’s specified design pressure
per ASTM E330 in both positive and negative directions.
Hold each load for a minimum of 30 seconds,
then release.
6.2.3 Impact Test
6.2.3.1 Using either the same assembly used for
the static pressure test or an identical assembly,
at the manufacturer’s option, conduct three impact
tests using one of the impact test methods described
in 5.2.2.1 at the following locations against
the push side of the door.
6.2.3.1.1 Impact 6 inches down from the top and
6 inches horizontally from the hinge edge of the
door.
6.2.3.1.2 Impact the mid-height of the door 6 inches
from the hinge edge.
6.2.3.1.3 Impact 6 inches up from the door bottom
and 6 inches from the hinge edge.
6.2.4 Cycle Test
6.2.4.1 Upon completion of the impact tests, the
same assembly shall be cycled per ASTM E1886.
6.2.5 Throughout the tests described in section
6.2 the door shall remain secured in the frame and
shall be operable at the conclusion of the tests.
6.2.6 Rating
6.2.6.1 Continuous hinges and pivots shall be rated
for the impact energy resistance in foot-pounds
and design pressure in pounds per square foot
and maximum size, based on the tested assembly
size for which they successfully complete the
required testing.
TOP
7 Latching Hardware
7.1 Locksets
7.1.1 Impact Test
7.1.1.1 Locksets shall be mounted in the test fixture
described in figure 6. Mounting shall be in
accordance with the lock manufacturer’s instructions.
Locksets are to be in the locked mode for
all tests.

Figure 6 – Lockset Test Fixture
TOP
7.1.1.2 Strikes shall be mounted to the simulated
frame section using the screws provided by the
lock manufacturer.
7.1.1.3 One 125 foot-pound impact shall be delivered
to the test fixture (push side) at a point 6 inches
from the simulated door edge using the pendulum
impactor specified in figure 3. If the lockset
handle or other parts are in the indicated impact
area, the impact location shall be moved upward
sufficiently to avoid hitting the parts.
NOTE: Impact energy specified delivers approximately
twice the energy to the latch as occurs in a
typical door assembly test using a 9 pound 2 x 4 missile
at 50 feet-per-second.
7.1.2 Structural Load Test
7.1.2.1 Upon completion of the impact test specified
in section 7.1.1, the test fixture and the same
specimen (figure 6) shall be mounted in a testing
machine. A load shall then be applied equal to 1.5
times the manufacturers’ designated design load.
The load shall be applied through a 3/4-inch roller
and 1/4-inch by 3-inch steel loading plate of sufficient
width to span the simulated door portion of the test fixture. This load shall be held for 30 seconds
and then released.
7.1.2.2 Upon completion of the structural test the
lockset shall be operable.
7.1.3 Lockset Rating
7.1.3.1 The lockset rating shall be the design load
and impact energy specified by the manufacturer
and verified by acceptable results in the impact
and structural load test described in this section.
TOP
7.2 Single Point Rim and Mortise Exit
Devices
7.2.1 Single point rim and mortise exit devices
shall be mounted on a door of the stiffness classification
and maximum size for which a rating is
to be determined. Mounting shall be in accordance
with the device manufacturer’s instructions.
7.2.2 Impact Test
7.2.2.1 One 350 foot-pound impact shall be delivered
to the pull side of the door using one of the
impact test methods described in section 5.2.2.1.
If hardware location interferes with the specified
locations for impacts the impact shall be located
as close to the specified location as possible in a
manner that avoids impact on the hardware.
7.2.2.2 Upon completion of the impact tests the
door shall remain latched and the single point rim
or mortise exit device shall be operable.
7.2.3 Static Pressure Test
7.2.3.1 Upon completion of the impact tests specified
in 7.2.2.1, the same assembly shall be mounted
in a static pressure test chamber and tested per
ASTM E330.
7.2.3.1.1 Apply 1.5 times the manufacturer’s specified
design pressure to the push side of the door.
Hold for a minimum of 30 seconds and release.
7.2.3.1.2 Upon completion of the test the single
point rim or mortise exit device shall be operable.
7.2.4 Rating of Single Point Rim and
Mortise Exit Devices
7.2.4.1 Single point rim or mortise exit devices
shall be rated for the design pressure in pounds
per square foot, impact energy resistance in footpounds,
maximum pair or single door leaf size,
and door stiffness classification specified by the
device manufacturer and verified by acceptable
results in the impact and structural load test described
in this section.
TOP
7.3 Multi-Point Latches
7.3.1 Multi-point latches shall be mounted on the
maximum size pair of the minimum stiffness class
doors specified by the manufacturer for testing.
Note: Since many exterior doors are used as a required
“means of egress”, building codes do not generally
allow the use of additional manual bolts and
locks on these doors. That is, it must be possible,
under emergency conditions, for these doors to be
opened with a single manual operation. The use of
auxiliary latching devices as a means of increasing
the windstorm resistance rating of an assembly
should be verified for acceptability under prevailing
building code requirements.
7.3.2 Impact Test
7.3.2.1 The door containing the device under test
(active leaf) shall be subjected to three 350 footpound
impacts using one of the impact test methods
described in Section 5.2.2.1 to the pull side
of the door. One impact is to be made at the upper
meeting edge of the door 6 inches below the
top edge of the door and 6 inches from the meeting
edge. The second impact is to be made at the
lower meeting edge of the door 6 inches above the bottom and 6 inches from the meeting door edge.
The third impact is to be made at the center of the
door opposite and 5 inches below the push bar.
If hardware location interferes with the specified
locations for impacts the impact shall be located
as close to the specified location as possible in a
manner that avoids impact on the hardware.
7.3.2.2 When other hardware is being evaluated
simultaneously with bolts (surface or flush type) to
increase the overall rating, then a fourth impact is
to be made at the centerline of the other hardware
and 6 inches from the meeting door edge.
7.3.2.3 Upon completion of the impact tests the
multi-point latch shall be operable.

Figure 7 – Impact Locations for Multi-Point Latch Test
TOP
7.3.3 Static Pressure Test
7.3.3.1 Upon completion of the impact test, the
same assembly shall be tested on the impact assembly
or mounted in a test chamber and tested
per ASTM E330 under uniform static pressure.
7.3.3.2 Starting at the design pressure specified
by the manufacturer, apply the pressure in 5 psf increments in both positive and negative directions
until failure occurs. Each pressure increment
shall be held for a minimum of 10 seconds in each
direction.
7.3.3.3 After each pressure increment, remove
the pressure and check the hardware for operability.
One pressure increment consists of both a
positive and negative pressure.
7.3.3.4 Record mode of failure and pressure increment
at failure.
7.3.4 Multi-Point Latch Rating
7.3.4.1 Multi-point latches shall be rated for the impact
energy resistance in foot-pounds and design
pressure in pounds per square foot as follows:
7.3.4.1.1 For pairs of doors with four or more
points of latching, the design pressure is the maximum
test pressure increment that did not result in
failure as determined by 7.3.3.3 divided by a safety
factor of 1.5.
7.3.4.1.2 For pairs of doors with single point latching
on the active leaf and multi-point latching on
the inactive leaf as described in 7.3.2.1, the design
pressure is the maximum test pressure increment
that did not result in failure as determined by
7.3.3.3 divided by a safety factor of 1.5.
7.3.4.1.3 For pairs of doors with single point latching
on the active leaf and multi-point latching on
the inactive leaf as described in 7.3.2.2 with surface
or flush bolts per ANSI/BHMA A156.16 Auxiliary
Hardware, mounted on the inactive leaf, the
design pressure is the maximum pressure increment
that did not result in failure as determined by
7.3.3.3 divided by a safety factor of 3.0.
TOP
8 Doors
8.1 Doors shall be tested in the largest size (overall
area, greatest width, greatest height) for which
a design pressure rating is to be applied. Requirements
for framing systems or other reinforcements
in doors shall be specified as defined in the manufacturer’s
follow-up inspection procedures. All
doors of the same design with smaller dimensions
shall be given the same rating as the test door(s).
8.2 Stiffness Classification
8.2.1 Doors shall be classified for stiffness by performing
the following twist test on a 3'0" by 7'0" sample of the full flush panel (no hardware preparations)
door construction under investigation.
8.2.1.1 Mount the door panel in a rigid test frame
and clamp the bottom two corners and one top
corner securely to the frame.
8.2.1.2 Apply a load of 300 lbf through a 2.5 inch
diameter by 1/4-inch thick steel pad to a point centered
3 inches down and 3 inches horizontally from
the free corner of the door per ANSI A250.4.
8.2.1.3 Measure the door deflection at the free
corner, as described in ANSI A250.4, to the nearest
0.01 inch.
8.2.2 Classifications
8.2.2.1 Doors shall be classified for stiffness as
follows in Table 1 based on the results of the twist
test.
Table 1 – Stiffness Classification
Corner Deflection |
Stiffness Class |
≤ 0.5 inch |
I |
> 0.5 inch and ≤ 1.0 inch |
II |
> 1.0 inch and ≤ 2.0 inches |
III |
> 2.0 inches and ≤ 3.0 inches |
IV |
> 3.0 inches |
V |
TOP
8.3 Assembly Tests
8.3.1 Doors shall be installed in each assembly
configuration for which a rating is to be determined.
The following list shall be used to select the
test configurations.
8.3.1.1 Single-swing with cylindrical single-point
latch.
8.3.1.2 Single-swing with mortise single-point
latch.
8.3.1.3 Single-swing with rim or mortise exit device.
8.3.1.4 Pairs of doors swinging in the same direction
with 4-point latching – surface rods.
8.3.1.5 Pairs of doors swinging in the same direction
with 4-point latching – concealed rods.
8.3.1.6 Pairs of doors swinging in the same direction
with 3-point latching – surface rods by cylindrical
latch.
Table 2 – Example Door Rating Data
Door Model: 1234 |
Stiffness Class II |
|
Configuration |
Maximum
Size |
Latch Throw
Min. (in) |
Latch Strength
Min. (lbf) |
Impact
(ft-lbf) |
Design Pressure
(psf) |
| Single Out-swing (cylindrical) |
4-0 x 8-0 |
1/2 |
1600 |
350 |
100 |
| Single In-swing (mortise) |
4-0 x 8-0 |
1/2 |
1600 |
350 |
100 |
| Single Out-swing (Rim) |
3-0 x 8-0 |
(1) |
(1) |
350 |
80 |
| Pair w/ 4-Point (CVR by CVR) |
8-0 x 8-0 |
(1) |
(1) |
350 |
80 |
| Pair w/ 3-Point |
8-0 x 8-0 |
(1) |
(1) |
350 |
80 |
| Pair w/ 4-Point (CVR by CVR) |
6-0 x 7-0 |
(1) |
(1) |
350 |
140 |
| (1) Components are rated in design pressure (psf) not latch strength (lbf) |
TOP
8.3.1.7 Pairs of doors swinging in the same direction
with 3-point latching – flush bolts or CVR by
mortise latch.
8.3.1.8 Pairs of doors swinging in the same direction
with 3-point latching-mortise exit device by
surface or concealed exit device.
8.3.1.9 Pairs of doors swinging in the same direction
with 2-point latching – rim exit device with removable mullion.
8.3.2 A minimum of 3 assemblies shall be tested
for single-swing configurations and a minimum of
three assemblies shall be tested for pair configurations.
Latching hardware configurations can be
varied between the individual assemblies to provide
coverage per 8.3.1. This includes combining
surface and concealed-rod type hardware in one
pair assembly to cover configurations from 8.3.1.4
and 8.3.1.5. The resulting ratings will be determined
separately for pair and single-swing configurations.
When the three assemblies of one swing
type vary, the rating for the door is to be based
on the highest design pressure test passed by all
three assemblies.
8.3.3 Qualifying Doors for Lite Kits – Where doors
are to be qualified to receive lite kits, at least one
assembly shall be tested with maximum lite kit size
desired. This assembly shall be an assembly or at
least one of the assemblies from 8.3.2. Multiple
lite kit designs and sizes may be tested for multiple
ratings. The rating for the door is to be based
on the highest design pressure test passed by the
glazed assembly, but shall not exceed the rating
of the opaque assemblies. The largest size (maximum area, height, and width of exposed light) of
the lite kit and the minimum sizes of the door perimeter
shall be defined. Requirements for framing
systems or other reinforcements in doors shall be
specified as defined in the manufacturer’s followup
inspection procedures.
8.3.4 Doors are to be tested installed in frames
using latching hardware and hinges with a design
pressure rating greater than or equal to the specified
design-pressure rating of the door.
8.3.5 Assemblies which incorporate manual surface
bolts or other latching hardware intended only
for use in severe storm conditions (hurricanes)
shall be evaluated for design pressure strength per
ASTM E330 with and without the additional hardware
engaged. The ratings for such assemblies
shall indicate design pressure for the assembly
both with and without the additional hardware.
TOP
8.4 Test Procedure
8.4.1 Each assembly configuration shall be tested
to 1.5 times the design pressure, per ASTM E330.
8.4.2 Each assembly shall be tested based on
the design pressure specified by the door manufacturer
per ASTM E1886. Impact and cyclic load
tests shall be conducted as specified in ASTM
E1886. (At the discretion of the test sponsor the
same or an identical assembly shall be permitted
for the structural test.) For doors designated by the
manufacturer as either in-swing only or out-swing
only, the impact test shall be conducted only from
the outdoor side of the assembly. For doors designated
as either in-swing or out-swing, the impact tests shall be conducted from the outside (push
side) of in-swinging assemblies on two samples
and from the outside (pull side) of an out-swinging
assembly on the third sample.
8.4.3 Assemblies shall remain closed and latched
during the tests specified and the active leaf shall
be operable at the conclusion of the tests.
8.5 Ratings of Doors
8.5.1 Ratings of doors shall include the following
information (see Table 2):
- Maximum Size;
- Stiffness Classification for selection of rim
and mortise exit devices;
- Design Pressure Rating for each configuration
type; (this provides consistency in
language);
- Impact Energy Resistance Classification;
- Minimum Latch Throw for single point lock
sets;
- Minimum Latch Strength for single point lock sets.
TOP
9 Door Lite Kits
9.1 Door lite kits shall be evaluated as complete
glazing systems designed for installation into specific
door types. These door types shall have been
qualified to receive lite kits in accordance with
paragraph 8.3.3. Glazing systems shall include
all parts necessary to install the glazing in the
door. This shall normally include at least a glazing
panel, frame, sealant or glazing compound and
fasteners. Requirements for framing systems or
other reinforcements in doors shall be specified as
defined in the manufacturer’s follow-up inspection
procedures.
9.1.1 Glazing systems shall be tested in the largest
size (maximum area, height, width of exposed
light) to be rated in the smallest standard door size
(minimum 3'0" x 7'0") that can accommodate the
glazing system.
9.1.2 Alternately, glazing systems shall be tested
as part of door assemblies as defined in paragraph 8.3.3. In this case, the largest size (maximum area,
height, and width of exposed light) of the lite kit
and the minimum sizes of the door perimeter shall
be defined.
9.2 Test Procedure
9.2.1 Static Pressure Test
9.2.1.1 Each assembly configuration shall be
tested to 1.5 times the design pressure, per ASTM
E330.
9.2.1.2 Install the glazing system into the type and
size of door specified by the glazing system manufacturer.
Three identical assemblies are required.
The doors shall be mounted in frames and bucks
as required for the standard door test procedure.
9.2.2 Impact Test
9.2.2.1 Test the assembly per ASTM E1886 with
the impacts required applied to the center and one
corner of the glazing panel in each assembly.
9.2.3 Cycle Test
9.2.3.1 Cycle test each assembly per ASTM
E1886.
9.2.3.2 Upon completion of the impact and cycle
tests there shall be no failure of the glazing system
as defined in the referenced standard ASTM
E1996.
9.3 Glazing System Ratings
9.3.1 Glazing systems shall be rated at the design
pressure used in the evaluation and shall include
minimum door size and maximum glazing dimensions
(maximum area, maximum height and maximum
width).
TOP
10 Sidelights and/or Transoms
10.1 Sidelights and/or transoms shall be tested
with doors, to the largest total size (maximum
area, height and width) to be rated. Testing shall
be performed per ASTM E1886 and ASTM E1996
with the impacts applied only to the glazed portion
of the assembly. Doors used in the evaluation assembly
shall be rated per this method for at least
the design pressure specified for the sidelight/
transom assembly.
10.2 Installation of sidelight and/or transom assemblies
shall be per manufacturer’s instructions.
Frames for these assemblies shall be evaluated for
installation in each wall type for which the product
is intended. Installation instructions shall include:
glazing material, sealants or glazing compounds,
installation procedures, and details of frame anchoring
methods.
10.3 Ratings for Sidelight and/or Transom
Assemblies
10.3.1 Sidelight and/or transom assemblies shall
be rated for design pressure based on tests in accordance
with ASTM E1886 and ASTM E1996.
TOP
11 Miscellaneous Components
11.1 Center Mullions Prepared for Hardware
11.1.1 Center mullions prepared for hardware
shall be tested at the maximum height specified
by the manufacturer. Install the mullion in a frame
of the maximum width for which a rating is desired
following the manufacturer’s instructions. Doors
used for this test shall be stiffened as described
in section 5.2.1.2.1, except that surface applied reinforcements
are to be removed in areas required
for mounting the latching device. Doors are to be
equipped with rim exit devices or other hardware
as specified by the manufacturer
11.1.2 Static Pressure Test
11.1.2.1 Load the assembly to 1.5 times design
pressure in accordance with ASTM E330 in both
positive and negative directions. Hold the pressure
applied for a minimum of 30 seconds, then
release.
11.1.3 Impact Test
11.1.3.1 On the same assembly used in the structural
test or an identical assembly, at the manufacturer’s
option, apply four impacts of 350 ft-lbf
using one of the impact test methods described in
section 5.2.2.1. One impact is to be applied at the
meeting edge of the doors 6 inches down from the
head jamb. The second impact is to be applied at
the meeting edge of the doors 6 inches up from
the sill and the third impact applied at the centerline
of the latch and 6 inches horizontally from the
latch edge of the door. Apply a fourth impact at
the center of the other door 5 inches below the
latch. Upon completion of the impact tests, conduct
cycle testing as specified in ASTM E1886. At the completion of these tests the hardware mullion
shall remain in place and the door assembly shall
be operable.
11.1.4 Hardware mullions shall be rated for the
impact energy successfully passed and for the
design pressure tested in the static pressure and
cycle tests.

Figure 8 – Impact Locations for Center Mullion Test
TOP
11.2 Thresholds
11.2.1 Thresholds are only evaluated for their ability
to retain latch bolts and strikes and remain secured
to underlying construction when subjected
to anticipated structural and impact energy loads.
11.2.2 Thresholds are to be tested in conjunction
with hardware mullions as described in section 11.1
when applicable. Thresholds that are designed for
direct attachment of latching devices shall be tested
as follows.
11.2.3 Thresholds shall be tested at the maximum
door opening width to which the resulting rating
is to be applied. Thresholds shall be installed in a
test assembly using a frame and stiffened doors
(per 5.2.1.2.1) known to be capable of sustaining
the required test pressure. Thresholds shall be attached
to a simulated floor using the number, size
and locations of fasteners specified by the manufacturer.
The set-up shall be for a single-point
latching on the active leaf and two-point latching
on the inactive leaf with the bolt and strike specified
by the manufacturer.
11.2.4 Static Pressure Test
11.2.4.1 The test assembly shall be loaded per
ASTM E330 to 1.5 times the design pressure
specified by the manufacturer in both positive and
negative directions. The pressure in each direction
shall be maintained for a minimum of 30 seconds,
then released.
11.2.5 Impact Test
11.2.5.1 The same assembly or an identical assembly
which has not been subjected to the 1.5
times design load test shall be used for this test at
the manufacturer’s option. Impacts (350 ft-lb) shall
be applied using one of the impact test methods
described in section 5.2.2.1 to a location on the
centerline of any latching device that engages into
the sill at a point 6 inches up from the sill. If the
assembly includes two latching locations, two impacts
are required. If a single latch point is used,
the threshold will be considered acceptable for two-point latching if two impacts are conducted at
the same location.
11.2.6 Cycle Test
11.2.6.1 The same assembly used for the impact
test in 11.2.3 shall be subjected to the cyclic pressure
test prescribed by ASTM E1886.
11.2.7 Upon completion of these tests, the door
assembly shall be operable and the threshold
shall remain in place.
11.2.8 Thresholds shall be rated for the impact
energy successfully passed and for the latching
load established in the structural load and cycle
tests. Latching load (lbf) shall be calculated as design
pressure (psf) times the area (square feet) of
the opening divided by 4 (the equivalent of onequarter
of the total load).
TOP
12 Selection Criteria
12.1 The following process is used to determine
Swinging Door Assembly Ratings for Severe Windstorm
Resistance from Component Ratings.
12.1.1 The first step in determining if an assembly
meets a code requirement for severe windstorm
resistance is for the building designer to determine
the required performance level for the opening.
This shall include a calculation of the required
minimum design pressure in pounds per square
foot and the determination of whether or not impact
resistance is required. In most cases ASCE
7 is specified by the applicable building code and
requires a thorough analysis of the building design
and location to determine design pressure for each
opening. State and local building codes will generally
specify when impact resistance is required
and at what level.
12.1.2 If impact resistance is required, each component
of the opening shall have an impact rating
equal to or greater than the impact energy required
for the opening.
12.1.3 Determine the wall construction type for the
opening (masonry, wood frame, steel, etc.). The
selected frame and anchorage method must meet
or exceed the design pressure and impact energy
requirements for the opening. The size at which
the frame is rated must be equal to or greater than
the size requirement for the opening.
12.1.4 Determine the type of hinge needed for the
application. Leaf and butt hinges are expressed in lbs force. To select leaf or butt hinges, multiply
the design pressure by the tributary area in square
feet for each hinge to determine the required hinge
design load in pounds force (lbf). Select a hinge
that meets or exceeds the design load and impact
energy requirements for the opening (see examples
in Appendix B).
12.1.4.2 Continuous hinges and pivots are rated
for design pressure, impact energy and door leaf
size. The design pressure and impact energy rating
for the selected continuous or pivot hinge must
meet or exceed the requirements for the opening.
The required door size for the opening must be
equal to or less than the door size listed for the
hinge.
12.1.5 To select cylindrical lock or mortise lock
for a door leaf, determine the latch bolt design
load (lbf) required, by multiplying one-half of the
nominal door leaf area in square feet by the design
pressure. Select a lock with a design load rating
(lbf) equal to or greater than the calculated latch
design load (see examples in Appendix B).
TOP
12.1.6 To select a rim exit, mortise exit, hardware
mullion, or multi-point latch configuration, compare
the rated hardware design pressure, impact energy
requirement, and door size with the opening
requirements. The selected hardware design pressure
and impact energy requirements must meet or exceed the design pressure and impact energy
requirements for the opening. The required door
size for the opening must be equal to or less than
the door size listed for the selected hardware.
NOTE: Stiffness classifications are only required for
rim and mortise exit devices.
12.1.7 If a light kit is to be installed, select a light
kit with a design pressure and impact energy rating
equal to or greater than the required values.
12.1.8 To select a door leaf compare the rated
design pressure, desired hardware configuration,
impact energy, and size requirements with the
opening requirements. Obtain the design pressure
rating for the specified hardware configuration
by checking the door rating data (see example
in table 2). The rated door panel design pressure
for the desired hardware configuration, impact energy,
and size must meet or exceed the requirements
for the opening. If rim exits or mortise exits
are specified, the door panel must meet or exceed
the door stiffness classification for the rim or mortise
exit device being used.
12.1.9 All components must be installed in accordance
with the component manufacturer’s instructions.
The assembly rating is equal to the lowest
design pressure rating of the selected components
and must be equal to or greater than the design
pressure required for the opening.
TOP
Appendix A
(normative)
Tolerances and Conversion of Measurements to SI
I-P Value |
0.05I-P Unit300 |
I-P
Tolerance |
SI Value |
SI Unit |
SI
Tolerance |
110 |
MPH |
NA |
49 |
M/s |
NA |
150 |
MPH |
NA |
67 |
M/s |
NA |
5 |
PSF |
±0.5 |
239 |
Pa |
±24 |
10 |
PSF |
±0.5 |
479 |
Pa |
±24 |
60 |
in |
±0.25 |
1524 |
mm |
±6 |
30 |
in |
±0.25 |
762 |
mm |
±6 |
40-5/16 |
in |
±1/8 |
1024 |
mm |
±3 |
1-1/4 |
in |
±1/8 |
32 |
mm |
±3 |
3/16 |
in |
±1/32 |
4.8 |
mm |
±1 |
16 |
in |
±1 |
406 |
mm |
±25 |
6 |
in |
±1 |
152 |
mm |
±25 |
3 |
in |
±1/8 |
76 |
mm |
±3 |
15 |
lbf |
±0.5 |
67 |
N |
±2 |
1 |
in |
±1/16 |
25 |
mm |
±2 |
350 |
ft-lb |
±3.5 |
475 |
N-M |
±5 |
100 |
lb |
±1 |
45.4 |
Kg |
±0.5 |
12 |
in |
±1/8 |
305 |
mm |
±3 |
24 |
in |
±1/8 |
610 |
mm |
±3 |
50 |
ft/sec |
NA |
1.52 |
M/s |
NA |
0.05 |
in/min |
±0.005 |
1.3 |
mm/min |
±0.1 |
300 |
lbf |
±3 |
1334 |
N |
±13 |
2.5 |
in |
±0.1 |
64 |
mm |
±2.5 |
1/4 |
in |
±0.03 |
6 |
mm |
±1 |
0.01 |
in |
NA |
0.25 |
mm |
NA |
0.5 |
in |
NA |
12.7 |
mm |
NA |
1.0 |
in |
NA |
25.4 |
mm |
NA |
2.0 |
in |
NA |
50.8 |
mm |
NA |
3.0 |
in |
NA |
76.2 |
mm |
NA |
TOP
Appendix B
(informative)
Example 1
Opening design pressure: |
per ASCE 7 = 67 psf, requires 350 ft-lb impact energy per local code. |
Opening size: |
3'0" x 7'0" — Single In-Swing |
Wall type: |
2 x 6 wood stud 16 in o.c. with 1/2 inch exterior sheathing — design pressure
rating 75 psf. |
Frame: |
16 ga. pressed steel with 5/8 inch stops. |
Frame rating: |
for 3'0" x 7'0" with 1/4" x 3-1/2" lag screw anchors to wood studs at 24" o.c. = 75
psf. & 350 ft-lb — OK. |
Hinges: |
(ABC Co. Model 1– 500 lbf – 350 ft-lb rating) 3 – 4" x 0.135" centered at 8" from
top, center of door and 8" from bottom. |
Latch: |
(XYZ Co. Model 2 – 1000 lbf – 350 ft-lb rating for class II doors) single point
mortise, 5/8" throw. |
Door: |
3'0" x 7'0" Hollow Metal — Stiffness class II, 70 psf, 350 ft-lb rating. — OK. |
| Location |
Area (ft2) |
Load @ 70 psf (lbf) |
| A Top Hinge |
3.125 |
219 < 500 OK. |
| B Middle Hinge |
4.25 |
298 < 500 OK. |
| Bottom Hinge |
3.125 |
219 < 500 OK. |
| D Latch |
10.5 |
735 < 1000 OK. |
Opening Design Pressure Rating = 70 psf based on door.
Qualifies for Impact Energy Rating of 350 ft-lbf.
TOP
Example 2
Opening design pressure: |
Per ASCE 7 = 80 pounds per square foot (PSF), requires 350 ft-lbf impact
energy per local code. |
Opening size: |
8'0" x 8'0" – Pairs of Doors |
Wall type: |
Masonry – design pressure rating 90 PSF – OK (Meets opening design pressure
requirement) |
Frame: |
14 ga. Pressed steel with 5/8 inch stops |
Frame rating: |
For a 8'0" x 8'0" with masonry T anchors is 80 PSF & 350 ft-lbf – OK (Meets
opening design pressure requirement) |
Hinges: |
(ABC Co. Model 1 - 4" x 0.125", 350 lbf, 350 ft-lbf rating): 4 req’d per leaf - centered
at 8" from top of door, centered at 34-2/3" from top of door, centered at
34-2/3" from bottom of door, & centered at 8" from bottom of door. |
Latch: |
(XYZ Co. Model 2 – Surface Vertical rod exit device, 85 PSF, 350 ft-lbf impact
rating, two latchbolts per exit device per door leaf, 3/4" latch throw – OK (Meets
opening design pressure req.) |
Door: |
4'0" x 8'0" hollow metal – stiffness class I, 80 PSF & 350 ft-lbf Rating – OK
(Meets opening design pressure requirement) |

| Hinge Location /
Door Area |
Area Calculation |
Load Calc |
Load vs Rating |
Pressure vs
Rating |
Criteria
Met? |
| Top Hinge / A |
(21 1/3” x 24”)/144 = 3.555 ft2 |
80 PSF x 3.555 ft2 = 284 Lbf |
284 Lbf < 350 Lbf |
N/A |
YES |
| Middle Upper Hinge / B |
(26 2/3” x 24”)/144 = 4.444 ft2 |
80 PSF x 4.444 ft2 = 356 Lbf |
356 Lbf > 350 Lbf |
N/A |
NO |
| Middle Upper Hinge / B |
(26 2/3” x 24”)/144 = 4.444 ft2 |
80 PSF x 4.444 ft2 = 356 Lbf |
356 Lbf > 350 Lbf |
N/A |
NO |
| Bottom Hinge/ C |
(21 1/3” x 24”)/144 = 3.555 ft2 |
80 PSF x 3.555 ft2 = 284 Lbf |
284 Lbf < 350 Lbf |
N/A |
YES |
| Latches / D |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
80 PSF < 85 PSF |
YES |
Result: |
Opening does not meet the design pressure requirement due to hinge rating. In
order to meet it, the hinges need to be replaced with higher rated ones (≥ 356
Lbf). |
TOP

American National Standard
Approval of an American National Standard requires verification by ANSl
that the requirements for due process, consensus, and other criteria for
approval have been met by the standards developer.
Consensus is established when, in the judgement of the ANSl Board of
Standards Review, substantial agreement has been reached by directly
and materially affected interests. Substantial agreement means much more
than a simple majority, but not necessarily unanimity. Consensus requires
that all views and objections be considered, and that a concerted effort
be made toward their resolution.
The use of American National Standards is completely voluntary; their existence
does not in any respect preclude anyone, whether they have approved
the standards or not, from manufacturing, marketing, purchasing, or using
products, processes, or procedures not conforming to the standards.
The American National Standards Institute does not develop standards and
will in no circumstances give any interpretation of any American National
Standard. Moreover, no person shall have the right or authority to issue
an interpretation of an American National Standard in the name of the
American National Standards Institute. Requests for interpretations should
be addressed to the secretariat or sponsor whose name appears on the
title page of this standard.
CAUTION NOTICE: This American National Standard may be revised or
withdrawn at any time. The procedures of the American National Standards
Institute require that action be taken periodically to reaffirm, revise,
or withdraw this standard. Purchasers of American National Standards
may receive current information on all standards by calling or writing the
American National Standards Institute.
Foreword
(This Foreword is not part of American National Standard A250.10-1998)
The material contained in this document has been developed under the
auspices of the Technical Committee of the Steel Door Institute.
Suggestions for improvement gained in the use of this standard will be
welcome and should be sent to the Steel Door Institute, 30200 Detroit
Road, Cleveland, Ohio, 44145-1967.
The organizations that have approved this standard are as follows:
American Institute of Architects
Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association
Canadian Steel Door Manufacturers Association
Cedar Valley Associates
Door and Hardware Institute
FM Approvals
HMMA/Division of NAAMM
Intertek Testing Services
Manufactured Housing Institute
National Association of Home Builders
Steel Door Institute
Therma-Tru
Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
Vetrotech Saint-Gobain
WDMA
The Technical Committee of the Steel Door Institute, which has developed
this Standard had the following personnel at the time of approval:
Allan Ashachik, Chairman
Dave Dedic, 1st Vice Chairman
Dan Buffenbarger, 2nd Vice Chairman
| Organization Represented |
Name of Representative |
| Amweld Building Products, LLC |
Allan Ashachik |
| Ceco Door Products |
Thomas R. Janicak |
| Curries Company |
Dave Dedic |
| Deansteel Manufacturing Company |
Claus D. Heide |
| Mesker Door Company |
Mike Torres |
| Pioneer Industries |
Kamal Sheikh |
| Republic |
Jason Lisewski |
| Security Metal Products Corporation |
Dan Buffenbarger |
| Steelcraft |
Kurt Roeper |
| Steel Door Institute |
J. Jeffery Wherry |
TOP
|