American National Standard
Test Procedure and Acceptance Criteria for — Physical Endurance for Steel Doors, Frames and Frame Anchors
Revision of ANSI/SDI A250.4-2001
Table of Contents
The primary purpose of this procedure shall be to establish a standard method of testing the performance of a steel door mounted in a hollow metal or channel iron frame installed with appropriate anchors, under conditions that might reasonably be considered an accelerated field operating condition.
The user of this performance standard must temper his usage with the knowledge that there are many variables that affect door and frame performance, such as different hardware, anchors, glass and louver cutouts, field modification by parties other than the manufacturer, environmental factors, such as heat, cold, moisture, etc.
- ANSI/BHMA A156.1-2006 Butts and Hinges
- ANSI/BHMA A156.3-2008 Exit Devices
- ANSI/BHMA A156.4-2008 Door Controls — Closers
- ANSI/BHMA A156.7-2009 Template Hinge Dimensions
Apparatus and equipment
The apparatus and equipment used shall be the same when testing doors or frames with frame anchors. The main testing structure shall be constructed as shown in figures 1 and 2. The structure shall conform to the parts shown, except the opening width and height are permitted to vary to allow the testing of various door sizes. The test frame for testing door or frame shall be anchored in such a manner as to insure rigidity.
The swinging mechanism shall be in two parts:
The door opener shall be an air motor positioned at 65° to the plane of the door in its closed position that will actuate an exit device mounted on the test door. The contact point shall be set to push the door open 60° ± 5°, and retract to allow the door closer to bring the door back into its original closed position and then begin the cycle again. See the specifications in figures 1 and 1A.
The exit device, door closer and hinges used in testing shall be selected based on the manufacturer’s recommendations for the testing level described in Swing Test Form 1. The manufacturer and model number shall be recorded in the report. All hardware shall be applied to the door and frame with fasteners provided by the hardware manufacturer (for example, machine screws or sex bolts) in the location recommended by the door manufacturer. The hardware shall conform to the latest editions of American National Standards ANSI/BHMA A156.1, 3, 4 and 7. The device shall be set to close the door at a rate of 15 cycles, ±1, per minute.
Inspect all hardware and silencers at regular intervals, and adjust or replace as necessary. It is acceptable to apply lubrication to hinges and exit devices.
Note: Where the applicable BHMA Test Standards have been followed, this information shall be recorded in the test report.
Preparation for test
The door shall be hung in the frame on the hinges. Care shall be taken to ensure the hinges are properly applied to the door and frame as recommended by the hinge manufacturer, and any hinge fillers, or shims, are in place. The clearance between the door and the frame shall be recorded in the test report.
The door frame shall be securely fastened to the test frame opening structure in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The manufacturer is permitted to select anchors for specific wall applications (i.e., wood stud anchors or steel stud anchors, loose or welded in or existing masonry wall anchors).
Silencers shall be installed on the frame and the stop face of the door shall contact the silencers. The frame shall be plumb, square, and rigid.
When applicable, wall surface materials (e.g., drywall) shall be applied to the test frame opening at the frame throat to simulate actual construction conditions.
Unless specified otherwise, the test shall be performed on a 3'-0" x 7'-0" nominal size door. A detailed description of the construction of the door and the applicable processes such as welding, bonding, etc. used for attaching components, shall be recorded in the test report, Swing Test Form 1, under the “remarks” section.
Unless specified otherwise, the test shall be performed on a 3'-0" x 7'-0" nominal size frame having a 5 3/4" jamb depth. A detailed description of the door frame which shall cover all components used in the frame's construction, as well as applicable processes (such as welding, etc.) used for attaching and connecting components, shall be recorded in the test report, Swing Test Form 2, under the “remarks” section.
A detailed description of the frame and anchoring system which shall cover all details of the anchors, as well as the means of attachment in the frame and the weight of the door used for the test shall be recorded in the test report, Swing Test Form 2.
Duration of the test shall be 250,000 cycles with latching for Level C doors; 500,000 cycles with latching for Level B doors; and 1,000,000 cycles with latching for Level A doors. A general inspection of the door shall be made at 25,000 cycle intervals for the first 100,000 cycles and at 50,000 cycles thereafter. A mechanical counter or equivalent shall be used to record the cycles.
The general inspection shall cover perimeter clearances between door and frame and all components readily accessible, such as face skins, exposed hinge and lock stiles, flush closing channels, end closures, hinge reinforcements, and lock body/face plate reinforcements and shall cover the integrity of assemble methods used to connect the door components.
Doors which have passed the cycling criteria at one level shall be deemed to have passed all lower levels. The results shall be recorded on a standard performance report, Swing Test Form 1.
Duration of the test shall be 250,000 cycles for Level C frames; 500,000 cycles for Level B frames; and 1,000,000 cycles for Level A frames. A general inspection of the frame shall be made at 25,000 cycle intervals for the first 100,000 cycles and at 50,000 cycle intervals thereafter.
The general inspection shall cover perimeter clearances between door and frame and all frame components readily accessible, such as corner clips and screws, corner tabs and slots, head and jamb tabs/slots hinge reinforcements, and strike reinforcements and shall cover the integrity of assembly methods used to connect the frame components.
Door frames which have passed the cycling criteria at one level shall be deemed to have passed all lower levels. The results shall be recorded as part of the test report, Swing Test Form 2.
The twist test is applicable in evaluating door construction only.
The deterioration of the door strength during the cycle test, if any, shall be checked through a series of twist tests. These twist tests shall be performed before the cycle test begins and then at 25,000 cycle intervals for the first 100,000 cycles and at 50,000 cycle intervals for the balance of the test.
During the twist test, the hinge pins and silencers shall be removed from the door and frame assembly and the exit device shall be unlatched. The door is then clamped in place as noted in figure 2. If necessary to facilitate twist testing, the door is permitted to be taken from the test fixture and installed in a separate twist fixture. Loads in 30 lb. increments shall be applied at the upper lock edge corner through the screw jack and force gauge in the area illustrated in figure 2. The deflection noted on the dial indicator shall be plotted against the load applied to the corner on Twist Test Form 3. A maximum 300 lb. load shall be applied. The load shall then be reduced in 30 lb. increments and corresponding deflections recorded and plotted on Twist Test Form 3. A smooth curve drawn through the points shall graphically demonstrate the reaction of the door to increasing and decreasing pressures at different cycle intervals.
At the completion of each twist test, the hinges shall be reassembled by means of inserting the hinge pins, silencers shall be reinstalled, the exit devise shall be latched, and the assembly shall be subjected to another 25,000 or 50,000 cycles. The condition of the silencers shall be noted and replacements made where deemed necessary.
7.1.1 — Doors shall not show any visual indication of metal fatigue, cracking or deformation at hardware cutouts or along form contours.
7.1.2 — Doors of laminated construction (cores laminated to face sheets, channels or stiffeners laminated to face sheets, etc.) shall not delaminate in excess of 10% of the total surface area. (Strike the door surface softly with a mallet to identify delaminated areas, if any).
7.1.3 — In doors of welded construction (stiffeners or channels welded to face sheets, etc.) breakage of welds shall not exceed 10% of the total weld of those face stiffeners.
7.1.4 — Top, bottom or edge channels shall remain securely in place, without any weld breakage.
7.1.5 — Where seams occur on doors, there shall be no opening or spreading of the seam.
7.1.6 — All hardware reinforcements shall remain securely in place and show no visual signs of metal fatigue, cracking or deformation.
7.1.7 — As a result of the twist test, the maximum deflection permitted shall not exceed 2 1/2" when loaded to 300 lb. for Level C. For Level B and Level A doors the maximum deflection shall not exceed 1 1/4" when loaded to 300 lb.
7.1.8 — Permanent deflection for doors shall not exceed 1/8" when load is removed.
7.1.9 — Tapped holes shall not strip.
7.1.10 — At the completion of the swing and twist tests, the door shall be fully operable.
7.1.11 — Upon completion of the foregoing checks and measurements, remove door from test structure and cut door into four equal sections with a horizontal and a vertical cut at the center of the door height and door width. Internal construction of door shall be inspected visually for delamination, metal fatigue, cracking and weld failure. The results of this inspection shall be recorded in the test report.
7.2.1 — Frames shall remain plumb, square, rigid, and show no visual signs of metal fatigue, cracking, or deformation at hardware provision cutouts or along form contours.
7.2.2 — Corners shall stay aligned with seams in a closed position.
7.2.3 — Perimeter clearances between door and frame shall not be greater than 1/16" from those listed at onset of test.
7.2.4 — Hardware reinforcements shall remain securely attached to the frame, with all welds intact.
7.2.5 — Tapped holes shall not strip.
7.2.6 — At the completion of the test, the frame shall not limit door operation. If during the test the door becomes inoperable, it shall be determined whether a defective door frame, hardware reinforcement, hinge, frame anchor, etc., caused the failure and shall be so noted in the test report.
American National Standard
Approval of an American National Standard requires verification by ANSl that the requirements for due process, consensus, and other criteria for approval have been met by the standards developer.
Consensus is established when, in the judgement of the ANSl Board of Standards Review, substantial agreement has been reached by directly and materially affected interests. Substantial agreement means much more than a simple majority, but not necessarily unanimity. Consensus requires that all views and objections be considered, and that a concerted effort be made toward their resolution.
The use of American National Standards is completely voluntary; their existence does not in any respect preclude anyone, whether they have approved the standards or not, from manufacturing, marketing, purchasing, or using products, processes, or procedures not conforming to the standards.
The American National Standards Institute does not develop standards and will in no circumstances give any interpretation of any American National Standard. Moreover, no person shall have the right or authority to issue an interpretation of an American National Standard in the name of the American National Standards Institute. Requests for interpretations should be addressed to the secretariat or sponsor whose name appears on the title page of this standard.
Caution Notice: This American National Standard may be revised or withdrawn at any time. The procedures of the American National Standards Institute require that action be taken periodically to reaffirm, revise, or withdraw this standard. Purchasers of American National Standards may receive current information on all standards by calling or writing the American National Standards Institute.
(This Foreword is not part of American National Standard A250.3-2007)
The material contained in this document has been developed under the auspices of the Technical Committee of the Steel Door Institute.
The original standard was issued on July 28, 1980 and was revised in 1990 and 1998, and the 1998 edition was reaffirmed in 2004. The current edition is a revision of the 1998 document with the contents being updated to reflect changes and advances that have take place in the steel door and frame industry.
Suggestions for improvement gained in the use of this standard are welcome and should be sent to the Steel Door Institute, 30200 Detroit Road, Cleveland, OH 44145-1967.
The organizations that have approved this standard are as follows:
- American Institute of Architects
- Architectural Testing
- Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association
- Canadian Steel Door Manufacturers Association
- Cedar Valley Associates
- FM Approvals
- Door and Hardware Institute
- Door Control Services
- HMMA/Division of NAAMM
- Intertek Testing Services
- Steel Door Institute
- Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
- Vetrotech / Saint Gobain
- Wind Science & Engineering Research Center
The Accredited Standards Committee A250 TC-1 developed this standard and had the following personnel at the time of approval:
James Urban, Chairman
J. Jeffery Wherry, Secretary
|Organization Represented||Name of Representative|
|American Institute of Architects||Joseph Berchenko|
|Architectural Testing||Dan Johnson|
|Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association||Michael Tierney|
|Canadian Steel Door Manufacturers Association||Bud Bulley|
|Cedar Valley Associates||Stan Horsfall|
|Ceco Door Products||Tom Janicak|
|Curries Company||Dave Dedic|
|Door and Hardware Institute||Keith Pardoe|
|Door Components||Tom Popow|
|Door Control Services||Craig Ordmandy|
|FM Approvals||Mark Tyrol|
|HMMA/Division of NAAMM||Russell Tauscher|
|Intertek Testing Services||Nancy Kokesh|
|Mesker Door, Inc.||Mike Torres|
|Pioneer Industries, Inc.||Kamal Sheikh|
|Security Metal Products||Terry Simpson|
|Steel Door Institute||J. J. Wherry|
|Ingersoll Rand||Kurt Roeper|
|Underwriters Laboratories Inc.||Matthew Schumann|
|Vetrotech / Saint Gobain||Christian Mueller|
|Wind Science & Engineering Research Center||Larry Tanner|